CO129-054 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [1-2] — Page 272

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

The information called for was supplies in December 1826; - but it does not appear that any contrary actuarial decision was come to by the Court.

From a President's Minute dated 25th August 1888, I gather that, while abolished in Penang, the system was still in force in both Malacca and Singapore. But the papers give no explanation of this anomaly.

The Grand Jury in Singapore, on 18th February 1829, followed the example of their brethren 20 years before in Penang and remonstrated against the Licensed House at that station, and in the following month the Recorder, with the same view, addressed the Grand Jury at Malacca.

Before this date, in Singapore, the subject appears to have attracted some attention, for there is a body of Regulations dated 1st May 1823, entirely prohibitory of all gambling, and bearing the signature of Sir Stamford Raffles.

Mr. Crawfurd, Resident, wrote forcibly to the Government of India against these Regulations on 15th July 1833, and on 18th September 1833 reported to the Bengal Authorities that he had been compelled, on his own responsibility, to stop the Licensing System temporarily as an alternative.

The year 1833, however, as shown above, is the latest date found in these papers, and in Governor Blundell's letter of 21st July last, transmitting the documents, it is stated that the subject...

Page 267

Edit History

2026-05-18 00:50:26 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
The information called for was supplies in December 1826; - but it does not appear that any contrary actuarial decision was come to by the Court. From a President's Minute dated 25th August 1888, I gather that, while abolished in Penang, the system was still in force in both Malacca and Singapore. But the papers give no explanation of this anomaly. The Grand Jury in Singapore, on 18th February 1829, followed the example of their brethren 20 years before in Penang and remonstrated against the Licensed House at that station, and in the following month the Recorder, with the same view, addressed the Grand Jury at Malacca. Before this date, in Singapore, the subject appears to have attracted some attention, for there is a body of Regulations dated 1st May 1823, entirely prohibitory of all gambling, and bearing the signature of Sir Stamford Raffles. Mr. Crawfurd, Resident, wrote forcibly to the Government of India against these Regulations on 15th July 1833, and on 18th September 1833 reported to the Bengal Authorities that he had been compelled, on his own responsibility, to stop the Licensing System temporarily as an alternative. The year 1833, however, as shown above, is the latest date found in these papers, and in Governor Blundell's letter of 21st July last, transmitting the documents, it is stated that the subject... Page 267
Baseline (Original)
twideration. The information called for was supplies in December 1826; - but to not see that any tarry actoral, decision was come to by the Court. From a Presidents Minute dated. 25th August 1888. I gather that, while abolished in Ferang, the Septem in force in both Malacca and Fairgapore. But of the anomaly a nomaly the papers give u : explanation. The Grand Jury in Jury in Lingapore, in 18th February 1829, followed the example of their brethren 20 years before Penang and remonstrated against the Licensed House at that station, and in the following mouth the Recorder, with the same view, addressed the Grand Jury at Malacca. 267 Beet before this sate, in Singapore the to subject appears t have attracted some attention, for there is a bode of Regulations dated 1st May 1823. entirely probibitory of all gambling, and bearing the - signature of Six Stamford Raffles Mr. Brawford, Resident, wrote forcibly to the Government of India against these Regulations on 15th on 15th July 1833, and on 18th September 1893 reported to the balentta Authorities that he had been his own. compelled on his. on responsibility to shopt the Licensing System temporary alternative. Ar a The year 1899. however, as shewn above, is the latest hate found in these papers.. and in Governor Blundell's letter of 21th July last, transmitting the 7.2107 documents, it is stated that the subject
2026-05-18 00:50:26 · Baseline
View content

twideration.

The information called for was

supplies

in December 1826; - but

to not see that any

tarry actoral, decision

was come to by the Court.

From a Presidents Minute dated. 25th August 1888. I gather that, while abolished in Ferang, the Septem

in force

in both Malacca and Fairgapore.

But of the anomaly

a nomaly the papers give u

: explanation.

The Grand Jury in

Jury in Lingapore,

in

18th February 1829, followed the example of their brethren 20 years before Penang

and remonstrated against the Licensed House at that station,

and in the following mouth the

Recorder, with the same view, addressed

the Grand Jury at Malacca.

267

Beet before this sate, in Singapore the

to

subject appears t

have attracted some

attention, for there is a bode of Regulations dated 1st May 1823. entirely probibitory

of all gambling, and bearing the - signature of Six Stamford Raffles

Mr. Brawford, Resident, wrote forcibly to the Government of India against these Regulations

on 15th

on

15th July 1833, and on 18th September 1893 reported to the

balentta Authorities that he had been

his own.

compelled on his. on responsibility to shopt the Licensing System temporary

alternative.

Ar a

The year 1899. however, as shewn above, is the latest hate found in these

papers..

and in Governor Blundell's letter of 21th July last, transmitting the

7.2107

documents, it is stated that the subject

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.